(we have some form of slight long QT syndrome, IIRC. gives me an elevated risk of getting tachycardia.)
It is done. My quest to get a scanner to working over iSCSI is complete.
I can now safely claim that Chris on SuperUser is wrong. There is nothing stopping you from having scanners running over a storage network.
https://sprocketfox.io/xssfox/2024/05/08/jbos/
This has been one of my dumbest, expensive and time consuming projects.
this is a lot better than products like defraggler, which operates on a file by file basis (it will consolidate all fragments of a file into the first available cluster that fits it) because that mostly sits there spinning CPU calculating which files to move where, instead of just giving the OS a big chunk of IO work
A quick looks shows that it seems to work like this in a pass:
1. grab a lot of fragments to a new cluster, consolidating them (so you get a new cluster with defragmented files)
2. once you're out of empty clusters or out of fragmented files, it consolidates existing clusters to create empty space
it repeats this until satisfactory
I accidentally found a security issue while benchmarking postgres changes.
If you run debian testing, unstable or some other more "bleeding edge" distribution, I strongly recommend upgrading ASAP.
27, ace/aro(?), some form of enby, autism and add, I work as a software developer, ancom
on all levels except physical, i'm drgn
plural system copiloted by Dusty and Klor, you can find him at @Klor
random gifts are OK (as long as it's not sexually explicit) and will make me very flustered
admin of fuzzy.systems, chairperson of fuzzy systems
will generally approve all follow requests as long as your account has *anything* in it
backup: @ChlorideCull